[MOBY-l] registry messages
edward.kawas at gmail.com
Tue Oct 16 09:45:47 EDT 2007
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moby-l-bounces at lists.open-bio.org
> [mailto:moby-l-bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of
> Dmitry Repchevsky
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 6:41 AM
> To: moby-l at lists.open-bio.org
> Subject: [MOBY-l] registry messages
> I was able to connect the registry using the schema (thx 2
> Edward) in moby docs.
> The schemas look to be generated from XML messages (not vice versa).
> No problem - it's simple enough to get in.
> The problem I have is that different services (schemas) uses
> similar objects (Simple, Input, Output...).
> As far as I understand they supposed to be the same, but not
> exactly :-(.
> Sometimes the difference is only in namespace (i.e in
> RegistryService "Simple.articleName" decrared within a
> namespace, but not in FindService).
> Is this a schema inconsistence or it's really the situation?
Probably an inconsistency.
Could you point me to those inconsistencies? I created the schemas and I
would love to make them as correct as possible.
> Because (by now I tested only findService) in schema we have
> but if I try to send the message with this namespace the
> service fails... (works OK without).
> The question is. DOES this schema reflects the real API?
> If not, is it correct to omit namespaces? (I checked it looks
> like the Central is easy about it, even it's wrong from xml
> point of view).
Omitting the namespaces should be okay.
> Sincerely Yours,
> moby-l mailing list
> moby-l at lists.open-bio.org
More information about the moby-l